Comparative Machinability Evaluation of Ferritic Ductile Iron Castings

Figures

Figure 1.  Schematic of machinability evaluation setup.
Back to Article



Figure 2.  Recordings of rotating speed and feed rate during a drilling test.
Back to Article


Figure 3.  Recordings of thrust force and torque during a drilling test.
Back to Article


Figure 4.  Examples of thrust force curves obtained in powder-forged materials, 
as a function of drilled depth.2

Back to Article


Figure 5.  Unetched structure of 11L17 steel (Material S-1).
Back to Article


Figure 6.  Typical etched structure of FC-0205 P/M steel (PM-1).
Back to Article


Figure 7a.  Change in thrust force as a function of drilled depth for materials of Series A.
Back to Article


Figure 7b.  Change in torque as a function of drilled depth for materials of Series A.
Back to Article


Figure 8a.  Drilling chips obtained when drilling the first hole in material D-1
Back to Article


Figure 8b.  Drilling chips obtained when drilling the first hole in material D-2.
Back to Article


Figure 9a.  Change in thrust force as a function of drilled depth for materials of Series B.
Back to Article


Figure 9b.  Change in torque as a function of drilled depth for materials of Series B.
Back to Article


Figure 10.  Densified layer under the tool after drilling in the PM-1 material.
Back to Article


Figure 11a.  Land wear developed after 80cm drilled depth on tools used for DI D-1.
Back to Article


Figure 11b.  Land wear developed after 80cm drilled depth on tools used for gray iron G-1.
Back to Article


Figure 12.  Land wear and buildup of debris on the cutting edge of the tool 
used for drilling in the 1045 steel (S-2) after 80cm drilled depth.
Back to Article


Figure 13.  Drilling chips obtained in Material G-1 and S-2.
Back to Article


13a.  G-1, 1st hole

13b.  G-1, 50th hole

13c.  S-2, 1st hole

13d.  S-2, 50th hole

Ductile Home      Officers & Directors      Back Issues      Contact Us      Legal